From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Hank Leininger <hlein@progressive-comp.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Dumb question: Why are exceptions such as SIGSEGV not logged
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 14:02:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030818210238.GG10320@matchmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200308182050.h7IKonga016378@marc2.theaimsgroup.com>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003 at 04:50:49PM -0400, Hank Leininger wrote:
> ..So not *all* such cases are cause for alarm. However, if you run one of
> the patches enabling logging of this, you quickly learn what's normal for
> the apps you run, and can teach your log-auditing tools and/or your brain
> to ignore them.
And why not just catch the ones sent from the kernel? That's the one that
is killing the program because it crashed, and that's the one the origional
poster wants logged...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-18 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-18 20:50 Dumb question: Why are exceptions such as SIGSEGV not logged Hank Leininger
2003-08-18 21:02 ` Mike Fedyk [this message]
2003-08-18 21:18 ` Hank Leininger
2003-08-18 21:25 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-18 22:12 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-18 22:39 ` David Schwartz
2003-08-18 22:44 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-08-18 22:53 ` David Schwartz
2003-08-19 6:54 ` Denis Vlasenko
2003-08-19 8:31 ` Proposal (was: Why are exceptions such as SIGSEGV not logged) Jakob Oestergaard
2003-08-19 14:52 ` Dumb question: Why are exceptions such as SIGSEGV not logged Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-08-19 18:51 ` David Schwartz
[not found] <lg0i.6yo.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <lgjJ.6Oo.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <lilr.p2.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <livc.wX.17@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-17 12:43 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
[not found] ` <lj7O.14a.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-17 12:52 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-17 13:09 ` Alan Cox
[not found] ` <lOll.3Jp.19@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-18 9:34 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-18 17:26 ` David Schwartz
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-08-18 1:56 Hank Leininger
[not found] <lv8Y.2XU.9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <lv8Y.2XU.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <lv8Y.2XU.13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <lviD.35d.3@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <lviD.35d.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <lvC1.3p9.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-08-17 14:29 ` Ihar 'Philips' Filipau
2003-08-16 20:10 Michael Frank
2003-08-16 20:49 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-08-16 21:42 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-16 23:06 ` David D. Hagood
2003-08-16 23:17 ` Doug McNaught
2003-08-16 23:41 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2003-08-17 8:17 ` Russell King
2003-08-16 23:49 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-17 20:54 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2003-08-18 4:28 ` Michael Frank
2003-08-18 9:15 ` David Schwartz
2003-08-19 2:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-08-19 13:27 ` Jesse Pollard
2003-08-19 19:28 ` David Schwartz
2003-08-19 19:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-08-19 20:01 ` David Schwartz
2003-08-18 14:31 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-18 17:52 ` Michael Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030818210238.GG10320@matchmail.com \
--to=mfedyk@matchmail.com \
--cc=hlein@progressive-comp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).