From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
To: Phil Oester <kernel@theoesters.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Ratelimit SO_BSDCOMPAT warnings
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 18:15:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200308182215.h7IMFecc013449@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:06:05 PDT." <20030818150605.A23957@ns1.theoesters.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --]
On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 15:06:05 PDT, Phil Oester said:
> Back in March, there was some discussion about ratelimiting the
> BSDCOMPAT errors, and James Morris provided a patch to achieve
> this.
> Unfortunately, it seems to have fallen through the cracks. Below
> is the patch again, updated for 2.6.0-test3 - please apply.
> static void sock_warn_obsolete_bsdism(const char *name)
> {
> - printk(KERN_WARNING "process `%s' is using obsolete "
> - "%s SO_BSDCOMPAT\n", current->comm, name);
> + static int warned;
> +
> + if (!warned) {
> + warned = 1;
Umm.. am I dense, or does this only warn once for *the first program*
to do it after the system boots? And you don't get another warning about
any OTHER programs until you reboot in a few weeks (possibly)?
If so, why are we bothering at all? Once *per process* I could see, but
once per boot?
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-18 22:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-18 22:06 [PATCH] Ratelimit SO_BSDCOMPAT warnings Phil Oester
2003-08-18 22:15 ` Valdis.Kletnieks [this message]
2003-08-18 22:48 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-19 0:36 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-19 1:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-08-19 14:32 ` Phil Oester
2003-08-19 0:37 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200308182215.h7IMFecc013449@turing-police.cc.vt.edu \
--to=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
--cc=kernel@theoesters.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).