From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: rob@landley.net
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@pobox.com
Subject: Re: headers
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:45:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030819084531.768d5823.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200308190855.07181.rob@landley.net>
On Tue, 19 Aug 2003 08:55:06 -0400 Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> wrote:
| On Monday 18 August 2003 21:45, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
| > Followup to: <UTC200308181907.h7IJ7im12407.aeb@smtp.cwi.nl>
| > By author: Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl
| > In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
| >
| > > From garzik@gtf.org Mon Aug 18 20:14:47 2003
| > >
| > > I support include/abi, or some other directory that segregates
| > > user<->kernel shared headers away from kernel-private headers.
| > >
| > > I don't see how that would be auto-generated, though. Only created
| > > through lots of hard work :)
| > >
| > > Yes, unfortunately. I started doing some of this a few times,
| > > but it is an order of magnitude more work than one thinks at first.
| > > Already the number of include files is very large.
| > > And the fact that it is not just include/abi but involves the
| > > architecture doesn't make life simpler.
| > >
| > > No doubt we must first discuss a little bit, but not too much,
| > > the desired directory structure and naming.
| > > Then we must do 5% of the work, and come back to these issues.
| > >
| > > In case people actually want to do this, I can coordinate.
| > >
| > > In case people want to try just one file, do signal.h.
| >
| > Oh yes, this is a whole lot of work.
|
| But is it 2.6 work, or 2.8 work?
I think that we are currently discussing it as 2.7 work.
--
~Randy
"Everything is relative."
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-19 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-18 19:07 headers Andries.Brouwer
2003-08-18 21:57 ` headers Randy.Dunlap
2003-08-18 22:04 ` headers Jeff Garzik
2003-08-18 22:17 ` headers Andries Brouwer
2003-08-19 1:45 ` headers H. Peter Anvin
2003-08-19 12:55 ` headers Rob Landley
2003-08-19 15:45 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030819084531.768d5823.rddunlap@osdl.org \
--to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).