From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: jes@wildopensource.com, zaitcev@redhat.com, khc@pm.waw.pl,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] RFC: kills consistent_dma_mask
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 11:31:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030819113120.7ac55d54.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1061317998.30567.44.camel@dhcp23.swansea.linux.org.uk>
On 19 Aug 2003 19:33:19 +0100
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:
> On Maw, 2003-08-19 at 17:55, David S. Miller wrote:
> > (d) Makes implementations have to verify the mask is usable
> > on every mapping attempt.
>
> Or once per type with a bit of thought about it. I deal with
> hardware that has 2 limits on its consistent allocs and a
> different one with its streaming I/O buffers. It doesn't seem
> too atypical either
Are you talking on the platform or the PCI device side?
If on the platform side, the device wants to use the most
capable range/mask/whatever available that also fits it's
limits.
If on the PCI device side, it's also a best fit problem.
Give a specific example so I can map this out in my head.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-19 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-17 22:34 [PATCH] RFC: kills consistent_dma_mask Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-18 6:37 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-18 12:44 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-18 12:43 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-18 15:54 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-18 16:49 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-18 18:21 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-18 18:50 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-18 21:58 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-19 9:24 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-08-19 9:21 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-08-18 13:00 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-08-18 8:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-08-18 15:15 ` Pete Zaitcev
2003-08-18 16:14 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-19 9:16 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-08-19 9:49 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-19 10:15 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-08-19 9:03 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-08-19 13:07 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-19 13:20 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-08-19 16:55 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-19 18:33 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-19 18:31 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2003-08-19 20:31 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-22 11:54 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-23 17:11 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-08-24 12:06 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-24 13:00 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-24 19:58 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-25 8:50 ` Jes Sorensen
2003-08-30 21:18 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-08-31 1:50 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-31 12:52 ` Alan Cox
2003-08-31 15:24 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-09-01 5:22 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-01 7:34 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-09-01 7:43 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-01 17:14 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-09-01 17:28 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-01 18:24 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-09-01 7:54 ` Alan Cox
2003-09-01 7:52 ` David S. Miller
2003-09-01 16:27 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2003-09-01 17:33 ` David S. Miller
2003-08-25 8:47 ` Jes Sorensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030819113120.7ac55d54.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jes@wildopensource.com \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=zaitcev@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).