From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263408AbTHVRqw (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:46:52 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263368AbTHVRqw
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:46:52 -0400
Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:5128
	"EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S263508AbTHVRqn (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:46:43 -0400
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:46:39 -0700
From: Mike Fedyk <mfedyk@matchmail.com>
To: Ruben Puettmann <ruben@puettmann.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
Subject: Re: linux-2.2 future?
Message-ID: <20030822174639.GG1040@matchmail.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Ruben Puettmann <ruben@puettmann.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Marc-Christian Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de>
References: <mzDG.3ry.27@gated-at.bofh.it> <mzWX.3MH.5@gated-at.bofh.it> <mV1t.7Wj.15@gated-at.bofh.it> <E19q9zt-0002Cz-00@baloney.puettmann.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E19q9zt-0002Cz-00@baloney.puettmann.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 01:22:25PM +0200, Ruben Puettmann wrote:
> I think 2.2 is not dead. I often see 2.2 kernels running on systems like
> wlan access points or dsl routers from different vendors. 2.2 is often
> used where stability is a must-have. At least security fixes have to go in.

And they still use something like 2.2.12 which has a few remote exploits. ;)