From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263552AbTHWOR1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:17:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263703AbTHWOR0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:17:26 -0400 Received: from home.wiggy.net ([213.84.101.140]:31163 "EHLO mx1.wiggy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263488AbTHWOQH (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2003 10:16:07 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 16:16:06 +0200 From: Wichert Akkerman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: evms or lvm? Message-ID: <20030823141606.GD9232@wiggy.net> Mail-Followup-To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3F47347F.7070103@mscc.huji.ac.il> <20030823101831.GA2857@localhost> <20030823094737.C995@animx.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030823094737.C995@animx.eu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Previously Wakko Warner wrote: > I noticed the kernel doesn't have LVM as an option now. Does both projects > just use the DM from userspace? Yes. Wichert. -- Wichert Akkerman It is simple to make things. http://www.wiggy.net/ It is hard to make things simple.