From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264029AbTHWR6V (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:58:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265308AbTHWRxO (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:53:14 -0400 Received: from pub234.cambridge.redhat.com ([213.86.99.234]:22285 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264916AbTHWRu2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Aug 2003 13:50:28 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Aug 2003 18:50:22 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Rogier Wolff Cc: Pavel Machek , Christoph Hellwig , davej@codemonkey.org.uk, kernel list , paul.devriendt@amd.com, aj@suse.de Subject: Re: Cpufreq for opteron Message-ID: <20030823185022.A32664@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Rogier Wolff , Pavel Machek , davej@codemonkey.org.uk, kernel list , paul.devriendt@amd.com, aj@suse.de References: <20030822135946.GA2194@elf.ucw.cz> <20030822155207.A17469@infradead.org> <20030822195427.GB2306@elf.ucw.cz> <20030823095521.B14519@bitwizard.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030823095521.B14519@bitwizard.nl>; from R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl on Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 09:55:21AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 09:55:21AM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote: > Guys, good programming practise would leave this in. If you want, > you could add a comment that in the current code, this is superfluous. People tend to have different options on good programming practive. In the linux kenrel world at least these idiom is usually avoided.