From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262507AbTHZDQq (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2003 23:16:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262509AbTHZDQp (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2003 23:16:45 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:42760 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262507AbTHZDQo (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Aug 2003 23:16:44 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 20:16:42 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: Nick Piggin Cc: "Randy.Dunlap" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Nick's scheduler policy Message-ID: <20030826031642.GC16831@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Piggin , "Randy.Dunlap" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3F48B12F.4070001@cyberone.com.au> <34251.4.4.25.4.1061782057.squirrel@www.osdl.org> <3F498439.60102@cyberone.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3F498439.60102@cyberone.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:36:25PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Randy.Dunlap wrote: > >Has anyone developed a (run-time) scheduler [policy] selector, via > >sysctl or sysfs, so that different kernel builds aren't required? > > > >I know that I have heard discussions of this previously. > > > > Not that I know of. This would probably require an extra layer of ... > In fact this might end up being incompatible with architectures > like SPARC... but I'm sure someone could make it work if they really > wanted to. > Why wouldn't it work on sparc?