From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262681AbTHZRSB (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:18:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262682AbTHZRSB (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:18:01 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:10254 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262681AbTHZRR7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Aug 2003 13:17:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2003 10:17:54 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: Francois Romieu Cc: Jeff Garzik , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [bk patches] net driver updates Message-ID: <20030826171754.GD16831@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Francois Romieu , Jeff Garzik , torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com References: <20030817183137.GA18521@gtf.org> <20030823154231.A11381@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030823154231.A11381@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 03:42:31PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > Jeff Garzik : > [net-drivers-2.6 update] > > drivers/net/sis190.c | 2094 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- > > > synchronize_irq() requires an argument when built with CONFIG_SMP. Shouldn't it also require it for the UP case? Or is this one of those subtle things that tells you it's not working on SMP?