From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264452AbTH2HAd (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 03:00:33 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264453AbTH2HAd (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 03:00:33 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:39876 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264452AbTH2HAc (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 Aug 2003 03:00:32 -0400 Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 08:59:32 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Felipe Alfaro Solana Cc: LKML Subject: Re: State of the CFQ scheduler Message-ID: <20030829065932.GL16684@suse.de> References: <1062078948.17363.4.camel@pilot.stavtrup-st.dk> <20030828194743.GH16684@suse.de> <1062107920.665.0.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1062107920.665.0.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 28 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote: > On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 21:47, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > It shouldn't be too hard to adapt the latest version from before -mm > > dropped it and adapting to the current kernels. If you want to give that > > a go, I'd be happy to help you out. > > Why don't you post a patch against 2.6.0-test4 or 2.6.0-test4-mm1 on > LKML? I would like to start using CFQ again :-) Heh, did you not read the email? :) I'll see if I get squeeze it in today, stay tuned. -- Jens Axboe