From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265149AbTIDQPY (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:15:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265239AbTIDQPX (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:15:23 -0400 Received: from 216-239-45-4.google.com ([216.239.45.4]:55772 "EHLO 216-239-45-4.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265149AbTIDQOj (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Sep 2003 12:14:39 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:14:37 -0700 From: Frank Cusack To: lkml Subject: Re: 2nd proc not seen Message-ID: <20030904091437.A25107@google.com> References: <20030904021113.A1810@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20030904021113.A1810@google.com>; from fcusack@fcusack.com on Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:11:13AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 02:11:13AM -0700, Frank Cusack wrote: > I think I've seen some recent talk about this problem. I have an HPAQ > xw6000 w/ 2xP4 CPUs. A RH kernel finds both CPUs (4 if I enable HT). A > kernel.org kernel only finds 1 (2 if I enable HT). Works with 2.4.22. If anyone is interested, I'll followup with the exact change from 2.4.21 that makes this work (I need to figure that out anyway). It's NOT the recent apic.c changes (local APIC), at least not by itself. /fc