From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263011AbTIGKiI (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2003 06:38:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263075AbTIGKiI (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2003 06:38:08 -0400 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:47821 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263011AbTIGKiG (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Sep 2003 06:38:06 -0400 Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 12:37:23 +0200 From: Adrian Bunk To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6: spurious recompiles Message-ID: <20030907103723.GO14436@fs.tum.de> References: <20030906201417.GI14436@fs.tum.de> <33384.4.4.25.4.1062887601.squirrel@www.osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <33384.4.4.25.4.1062887601.squirrel@www.osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 03:33:21PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > When doing a "make" inside an already compiled kernel source there > > shouldn't be anything rebuilt. I've identified three places where this > > isn't the case in recent 2.6 kernels: > > > > 1. ikconfig > > CC kernel/configs.o > > even when the .config wasn't changed >... > I posted a patch based on Sam Ravnborg's comments that might fix it, > but I haven't verified it yet... The patch is in this message: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106272687506379&w=2 >... It seems I missed this mail. The patch in this mail seems to fix the recompiles. > Thanks, > ~Randy cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed