linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: slpratt@austin.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Minor scheduler fix to get rid of skipping in xmms
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 19:33:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030908193344.157962b8.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200309091231.48709.kernel@kolivas.org>

Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org> wrote:
>
> > Correction sorry: These changes were due to
>  > sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch and the test results say
>  > volano-results-2.6.0-test5-A0-*
> 
>  Further testing shows the patch: sched-balance-fix-2.6.0-test3-mm3-A0.patch to 
>  have no effect on volano results by itself. 

OK, thanks.

As I have just learnt that volanomark is dominated by sched_yield()-based
userspace locking I have suddenly lost all interest in it.  We don't want
to tune the kernel for braindead locking implementations.  Call me when it
has been converted to futexes ;)

Do we know what specjbb is doing internally?



  reply	other threads:[~2003-09-09  2:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-09-08 22:27 [PATCH] Minor scheduler fix to get rid of skipping in xmms Steven Pratt
2003-09-08 22:56 ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-08 23:22   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-09-09  2:10   ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-09  2:16     ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-09  2:31       ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-09  2:33         ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2003-09-09  4:14         ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-09  6:49           ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-09 23:53           ` Cliff White
2003-09-10  2:12             ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-10 19:05               ` Steven Pratt
2003-09-10 20:23                 ` Dave Hansen
     [not found]                 ` <3F5FE385.10204@cyberone.com.au>
     [not found]                   ` <3F607E62.3010903@austin.ibm.com>
     [not found]                     ` <3F60873B.4000005@cyberone.com.au>
2003-09-11 22:57                       ` Steven Pratt
2003-09-11  0:14               ` Cliff White
2003-09-09 22:06   ` Steven Pratt
2003-09-09 22:12     ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-10 13:59       ` Steven Pratt
2003-09-10 18:51   ` Steven Pratt
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-11 23:32 Craig Thomas
2003-09-11  2:55 Andrew Theurer
2003-09-11 11:04 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-11 13:05   ` Andrew Theurer
2003-09-11 13:53     ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-11 14:37       ` Andrew Theurer
     [not found] <tCPY.4xU.1@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <tDsR.5tY.31@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <tZ0f.49P.5@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <tZjz.4Bn.7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-09-09 23:24       ` David Mosberger-Tang
2003-09-06 15:58 John Yau
2003-09-06 16:57 ` Michael Buesch
2003-09-06  9:46 John Yau
2003-09-06 10:03 ` Michael Buesch
2003-09-06 17:01 ` Robert Love
2003-09-06 17:59   ` John Yau
2003-09-06 18:17   ` John Yau
2003-09-06 19:42     ` Rahul Karnik
2003-09-06 20:04     ` Robert Love
2003-09-06 22:41       ` John Yau
2003-09-07  2:40         ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-09-07  5:13         ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-07  7:48           ` Johnny Yau
2003-09-07  8:10             ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-07  8:35               ` John Yau
2003-09-07  9:26                 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-07 17:30                   ` John Yau
2003-09-07 17:36                     ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-08  0:22                     ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-08  0:27                       ` David Lang
2003-09-08  0:47                         ` Con Kolivas
2003-09-07  5:08       ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-07  6:18         ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-07  6:29           ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-07  6:45             ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-07  6:59               ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-07  7:02                 ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-07 14:32             ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-09-07 17:02           ` Robert Love
2003-09-07 17:34             ` Andrew Morton
2003-09-07 18:12               ` Nick Piggin
2003-09-07 18:13             ` Nick Piggin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030908193344.157962b8.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=slpratt@austin.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).