From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261310AbTIKOBS (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:01:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261311AbTIKOBS (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:01:18 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:60304 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261310AbTIKOBR (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:01:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:01:08 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Linus Torvalds Cc: richard.brunner@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 workaround for Athlon/Opteron prefetch errata Message-Id: <20030911160108.5678113b.ak@suse.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20030911012708.GD3134@wotan.suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 11 Sep 2003 06:54:53 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote: > > This patch is fragile and looks pointless. Why do you think it is fragile? I don't see anything fragile in it. > > What's wrong with the current status quo that just says "Athlon prefetch > is broken"? It doesn't fix user space for once. -Andi