From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Memory mapped IO vs Port IO
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 17:25:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030911162504.GL21596@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <p73oexri9kx.fsf@oldwotan.suse.de>
On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 06:17:02PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> The overhead of checking for PIO vs mmio at runtime in the drivers
> should be completely in the noise on any non ancient CPU (both MMIO
> and PIO typically take hundreds or thousands of CPU cycles for the bus
> access, having an dynamic function call or an if before that is makes
> no difference at all)
That's not true for MMIO writes which are posted. They should take
no longer than a memory write. For MMIO reads and PIO reads & writes,
you are, of course, correct.
--
"It's not Hollywood. War is real, war is primarily not about defeat or
victory, it is about death. I've seen thousands and thousands of dead bodies.
Do you think I want to have an academic debate on this subject?" -- Robert Fisk
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-11 16:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20030911160116.GI21596@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-11 16:17 ` Memory mapped IO vs Port IO Andi Kleen
2003-09-11 16:25 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2003-09-11 16:31 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-11 16:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-09-11 17:12 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-11 17:25 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-12 1:39 ` jw schultz
2003-09-12 16:10 ` Anthony Dominic Truong
2003-09-12 16:22 ` Jamie Lokier
2003-09-12 16:27 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 17:48 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-11 17:13 ` Jamie Lokier
[not found] ` <20030911161450.GA23536@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-11 16:20 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] <20030911192550.7dfaf08c.ak@suse.de.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <1063308053.4430.37.camel@huykhoi.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030912162713.GA4852@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <20030912174807.GA629@sgi.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-09-12 18:00 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-12 18:04 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 18:09 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-12 18:11 ` Tim Hockin
2003-09-12 18:24 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 18:29 ` Andi Kleen
2003-09-12 18:58 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-09-12 19:51 ` Jesse Barnes
2003-09-12 16:41 John Bradford
2003-09-12 21:52 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-09-13 4:01 ` Mike Fedyk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-11 16:01 Matthew Wilcox
2003-09-11 16:14 ` Måns Rullgård
2003-09-11 16:14 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030911162504.GL21596@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=willy@debian.org \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).