From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261445AbTIKRvl (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:51:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261453AbTIKRvT (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:51:19 -0400 Received: from mail.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:55697 "EHLO mail.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261445AbTIKRsu (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:48:50 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:48:39 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Andi Kleen Cc: richard.brunner@amd.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.6 workaround for Athlon/Opteron prefetch errata Message-ID: <20030911174839.GM29532@mail.jlokier.co.uk> References: <99F2150714F93F448942F9A9F112634C0638B196@txexmtae.amd.com> <20030911012708.GD3134@wotan.suse.de> <20030911165845.GE29532@mail.jlokier.co.uk> <20030911190516.64128fe9.ak@suse.de> <20030911173245.GJ29532@mail.jlokier.co.uk> <20030911193954.63724a82.ak@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030911193954.63724a82.ak@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andi Kleen wrote: > signal exception path is thousands of cycles, we're talking about tens > of cycles here. Tens vs thousands == percentage points. Isn't it about 20 cycles per mispredicted branch on a P4? Five of those and we're talking several percent slowdown, ridiculous as it seems. -- Jamie