From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261675AbTILEsT (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:48:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261676AbTILEsT (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:48:19 -0400 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:39697 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261675AbTILEsQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:48:16 -0400 Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:48:20 -0700 From: Mike Fedyk To: Bernd Eckenfels Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Reiser3/4 & Ext2/3 was: First impressions of reiserfs4 Message-ID: <20030912044820.GG26618@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Bernd Eckenfels , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030912005007.B11566@bitwizard.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 03:20:37AM +0200, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <20030912005007.B11566@bitwizard.nl> you wrote: > > at all. But no backup superblock, is just plain wrong. > > this totally depends on the capabilities of the fsck and in-kerlen journal > replay code, if they can reconstruct the data in there. And if you have no superblock how does it know where the journal is?