* What to use with 2.6.x instead of iproute2?
@ 2003-09-27 15:19 Michal Kochanowicz
2003-09-27 16:11 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-09-29 15:17 ` Chris Friesen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michal Kochanowicz @ 2003-09-27 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Hi!
It seems that iproute2 is not maintained any more and it doesn't build
with kernel 2.6.0-test5.
What tool one should use to set the interfaces, bridges and such up on
2.6.x kernels?
Regards
--
--= Michal Kochanowicz =--==--==BOFH==--==--= michal@michal.waw.pl =--
--= finger me for PGP public key or visit http://michal.waw.pl/PGP =--
--==--==--==--==--==-- Vodka. Connecting people.--==--==--==--==--==--
A chodzenie po górach SSIE!!!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: What to use with 2.6.x instead of iproute2?
2003-09-27 15:19 What to use with 2.6.x instead of iproute2? Michal Kochanowicz
@ 2003-09-27 16:11 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-09-29 15:17 ` Chris Friesen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kevin P. Fleming @ 2003-09-27 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Kochanowicz; +Cc: linux-kernel
Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems that iproute2 is not maintained any more and it doesn't build
> with kernel 2.6.0-test5.
>
> What tool one should use to set the interfaces, bridges and such up on
> 2.6.x kernels?
>
> Regards
Using the patches from RedHat's iproute2 SRPM I can build iproute2
against 2.6.0-test5 headers with no problems, and it works. With TC
support, even.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: What to use with 2.6.x instead of iproute2?
2003-09-27 15:19 What to use with 2.6.x instead of iproute2? Michal Kochanowicz
2003-09-27 16:11 ` Kevin P. Fleming
@ 2003-09-29 15:17 ` Chris Friesen
2003-09-29 15:29 ` Kevin P. Fleming
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Chris Friesen @ 2003-09-29 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Kochanowicz; +Cc: linux-kernel
Michal Kochanowicz wrote:
> Hi!
>
> It seems that iproute2 is not maintained any more and it doesn't build
> with kernel 2.6.0-test5.
Is Alexey still the iproute2 maintainer? Has anyone sent him a patch
for 2.6?
Chris
--
Chris Friesen | MailStop: 043/33/F10
Nortel Networks | work: (613) 765-0557
3500 Carling Avenue | fax: (613) 765-2986
Nepean, ON K2H 8E9 Canada | email: cfriesen@nortelnetworks.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: What to use with 2.6.x instead of iproute2?
2003-09-29 15:17 ` Chris Friesen
@ 2003-09-29 15:29 ` Kevin P. Fleming
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kevin P. Fleming @ 2003-09-29 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Friesen; +Cc: Michal Kochanowicz, linux-kernel
Chris Friesen wrote:
> Is Alexey still the iproute2 maintainer? Has anyone sent him a patch
> for 2.6?
>
There are no patches to iproute2 required to get it to compile against
2.6 headers; the only patch required was to linux/netdevice.h, which
has been included in 2.6.0-test6.
However, it would be wonderful if someone knowledgeable could take
over maintainership of iproute2 if Alexey can no longer do it. It's in
a sorry state at the moment, and most distros ship significantly
patched versions.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-09-29 15:29 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-09-27 15:19 What to use with 2.6.x instead of iproute2? Michal Kochanowicz
2003-09-27 16:11 ` Kevin P. Fleming
2003-09-29 15:17 ` Chris Friesen
2003-09-29 15:29 ` Kevin P. Fleming
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).