From: Karol Kozimor <sziwan@hell.org.pl>
To: Patrick Mochel <mochel@osdl.org>
Cc: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PM][ACPI] /proc/acpi/alarm halfway working
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 01:46:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030927234630.GA32525@hell.org.pl> (raw)
Hi,
I've just tested 2.6.0-test5-mm4, it seems that the /proc/acpi/alarm
has ceased to deadlock my laptop and actually started to work as
expected. The only drawback is:
#v+
irq 9: nobody cared!
Call Trace:
[<c010c57e>] __report_bad_irq+0x2a/0x8b
[<c010c668>] note_interrupt+0x6f/0x9f
[<c010c856>] do_IRQ+0xe2/0xe4
[<c02d1668>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
[<c01f007b>] sys_shmat+0x1f6/0x2b6
[<c012256c>] do_softirq+0x40/0x97
[<c010c83d>] do_IRQ+0xc9/0xe4
[<c02d1668>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
[<c01fb045>] acpi_os_write_port+0x33/0x35
[<c020f8aa>] acpi_hw_low_level_write+0x118/0x122
[<c021e6fe>] acpi_ut_trace+0x28/0x2c
[<c020f5cf>] acpi_hw_register_write+0xca/0x16b
[<c020f26a>] acpi_set_register+0x1d0/0x2aa
[<c02232ce>] acpi_system_write_alarm+0x497/0x520
[<c0150711>] vfs_write+0xbc/0x127
[<c0150821>] sys_write+0x42/0x63
[<c02d14fb>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
handlers:
[<c01faed6>] (acpi_irq+0x0/0x16)
Disabling IRQ #9
#v-
This happens upon the first echo > proc/acpi/alarm. The echo, however, sets
the time right, and the system is actually woken up successfully (S1, S3,
S4 were tested). Subsequent echos work, but do not generate the above
messages. Since IRQ 9 is what ACPI resides on, almost no new events are
reported (except those explicitely trigerred by _WAK).
The chipset is i845M; tell me if full dmesg is needed.
Best regards,
--
Karol 'sziwan' Kozimor
sziwan@hell.org.pl
next reply other threads:[~2003-09-27 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-27 23:46 Karol Kozimor [this message]
2003-10-10 22:34 ` [PM][ACPI] /proc/acpi/alarm halfway working Patrick Mochel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20030927234630.GA32525@hell.org.pl \
--to=sziwan@hell.org.pl \
--cc=acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mochel@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).