From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263036AbTJBBA5 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:00:57 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263116AbTJBBA5
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:00:57 -0400
Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk ([130.88.200.93]:26379 "EHLO
	serenity.mcc.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263036AbTJBBA4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:00:56 -0400
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 02:00:54 +0100
From: John Levon <levon@movementarian.org>
To: bill davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Who changed /proc/<pid>/ in 2.6.0-test5-bk9?
Message-ID: <20031002010054.GA13639@compsoc.man.ac.uk>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309271822450.6141-100000@home.osdl.org> <16250.38688.152166.875893@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20031001115248.GC23819@compsoc.man.ac.uk> <blfd05$ipr$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <blfd05$ipr$1@gatekeeper.tmr.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
X-Url: http://www.movementarian.org/
X-Record: King of Woolworths - L'Illustration Musicale
X-Scanner: exiscan for exim4 (http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/) *1A4rpv-0008fC-Ee*qW4d75zk10w*
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:21:25PM +0000, bill davidsen wrote:

> finger on it. In any case, I think the OP was noting that it was a
> fairly impactful (is that a word?) change not to get a line in the
> changelog. That's directed to whoever actually prepares the CL, not the

It did get in the changelog (it's automated). It just didn't get sent
for public review at all.

john
-- 
Khendon's Law:
If the same point is made twice by the same person, the thread is over.