From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263830AbTJ1C6d (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:58:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263832AbTJ1C6d (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:58:33 -0500 Received: from auth22.inet.co.th ([203.150.14.104]:20998 "EHLO auth22.inet.co.th") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263830AbTJ1C6c (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 21:58:32 -0500 From: Michael Frank To: Nick Piggin , Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test8/test9 io scheduler needs tuning? Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 10:58:16 +0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: cliff white , Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <200310261201.14719.mhf@linuxmail.org> <1067305071.1693.14.camel@laptop-linux> <3F9DCAE0.1010109@cyberone.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3F9DCAE0.1010109@cyberone.com.au> X-OS: KDE 3 on GNU/Linux MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310281058.16710.mhf@linuxmail.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 28 October 2003 09:48, Nick Piggin wrote: > > Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > >I'll try it with my software suspend patch. Under 2.4, I get around 45 > >pages per jiffy written when suspending. Under 2.6, I'm currently > >getting 2-4, so any improvement should be obvious! > > > > It might speed it up a bit for you. Although maybe you are measuring > with 100 vs 1000 jiffies/s? Good point ;) Regards Michael