From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262131AbTJ3C66 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:58:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262133AbTJ3C66 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:58:58 -0500 Received: from orion.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.90]:27402 "EHLO orion.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262131AbTJ3C65 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Oct 2003 21:58:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:58:50 -0200 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Bernd Eckenfels Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right Message-ID: <20031030025849.GY21946@conectiva.com.br> Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Bernd Eckenfels , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031030013418.GD3094@digitasaru.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://advogato.org/person/acme Organization: Conectiva S.A. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Em Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 03:54:44AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels escreveu: > In article <20031030013418.GD3094@digitasaru.net> you wrote: > > I don't see any reason why we *shouldn't* look at the problem and try to > > do it. What reasons do you see for not persuing the problem to its > > inevitible implementation? > > Just do it. :) Exactly, the idea is controversial, etc, but you can always show us an implementation for comments :) - Arnaldo