From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263574AbTJaVIq (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:08:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263581AbTJaVIq (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:08:46 -0500 Received: from rth.ninka.net ([216.101.162.244]:9632 "EHLO rth.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263574AbTJaVIp (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Oct 2003 16:08:45 -0500 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:08:33 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: Hans Reiser Cc: tytso@mit.edu, andersen@codepoet.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Things that Longhorn seems to be doing right Message-Id: <20031031130833.42788aec.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3FA2CA5E.3050308@namesys.com> References: <3F9F7F66.9060008@namesys.com> <20031029224230.GA32463@codepoet.org> <20031030015212.GD8689@thunk.org> <3FA0C631.6030905@namesys.com> <20031030174809.GA10209@thunk.org> <3FA16545.6070704@namesys.com> <20031030203146.GA10653@thunk.org> <3FA211D3.2020008@namesys.com> <20031031193016.GA1546@thunk.org> <3FA2CA5E.3050308@namesys.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:47:26 +0300 Hans Reiser wrote: > If you say that names resolve to single objects and never should > resolve to sets of objects, we disagree. While I have no personal opinion either way on the utility of such an idea, I do think that if we ever do support a "one to many" mapping of names to inodes we should make you do the security audit of a full Linux system in the presence of this feature, deal? :-)