From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261595AbTKBJ1d (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2003 04:27:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261601AbTKBJ1d (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2003 04:27:33 -0500 Received: from arnor.apana.org.au ([203.14.152.115]:33290 "EHLO arnor.me.apana.org.au") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261595AbTKBJ1c (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Nov 2003 04:27:32 -0500 Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 20:27:23 +1100 To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.0test9 Reiserfs boot time "buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:431" Message-ID: <20031102092723.GA4964@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20031029141931.6c4ebdb5.akpm@osdl.org> <20031101233354.1f566c80.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031101233354.1f566c80.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i From: Herbert Xu Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 11:33:54PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > aargh. I thought Debian's 2.6 kernels were unmodified. Are they carrying > any other changes? Yes we are. You can find the changes in http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.6.0-test9/ > That _should_ work. The pagecache pages should be in such a state that all > buffers are freeable and yes, we can leave the pagecache there. But this > could cause problems if the device was repartitioned in between, or if it > was hotswapped. I don't think we shoot down pagecache anywhere else for > this. Yes, however it should be safe to stop set_blocksize from calling truncate_inode_pages, right? Cheers, -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt