From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261959AbTKCJyi (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2003 04:54:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261965AbTKCJyi (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2003 04:54:38 -0500 Received: from madrid10.amenworld.com ([62.193.203.32]:28689 "EHLO madrid10.amenworld.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261959AbTKCJyh (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2003 04:54:37 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 10:49:13 +0100 From: DervishD To: Mark Mielke Cc: Linux-kernel Subject: Re: Using proc in chroot environments Message-ID: <20031103094913.GE54@DervishD> References: <20031102204934.GB54@DervishD> <20031103031012.GA30460@mark.mielke.cc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20031103031012.GA30460@mark.mielke.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Organization: Pleyades User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark :) * Mark Mielke dixit: > > I'm using a chroot environment on my main disk as a 'crash test > > dummy', and I need to access the proc filesystem inside it. Since > It sounds to me, as if you want something like UML... :-) More or less. It's just the chroot is easier for me, but I would like to test UML someday O:)) > chroot environments are traditionally quite minimal, meaning that they > usually don't require /dev/pts, /proc, etc. I know, but I think that UML is unnecessarily complex for me. I can go with just a chrooted env. Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 http://www.pleyades.net & http://raul.pleyades.net/