From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262592AbTKCTxP (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:53:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262774AbTKCTxP (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:53:15 -0500 Received: from [217.73.128.98] ([217.73.128.98]:21895 "EHLO linuxhacker.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262592AbTKCTxM (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Nov 2003 14:53:12 -0500 Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 21:53:06 +0200 Message-Id: <200311031953.hA3Jr6vM012874@car.linuxhacker.ru> From: Oleg Drokin Subject: Re: Reiserfs 3.5 disk format and kernel 2.6.0test9 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1067869986.4841.4.camel@wathlon> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello! Jorge P?rez "Burgos (Koke)" wrote: JPrBK> I have several partitions with 3.5.x reiserfs disk format, when i boot JPrBK> up with kernel 2.6.0test9, i have these errors in each partition, even JPrBK> though the system seems to work well: JPrBK> buffer layer error at fs/buffer.c:431 JPrBK> Call Trace: JPrBK> [] __find_get_block_slow+0x85/0x120 This all looks like this newly discovered problem with 2.6.0-test9 + debian patchset. Either unapply the part about not doing truncate_inode_pages() in fs/block_dev.c::kill_bdev() or apply this patch below which should also help. Bye, Oleg ===== fs/reiserfs/super.c 1.69 vs edited ===== --- 1.69/fs/reiserfs/super.c Tue Sep 23 07:16:25 2003 +++ edited/fs/reiserfs/super.c Sun Nov 2 11:11:36 2003 @@ -942,6 +942,7 @@ { struct buffer_head * bh; struct reiserfs_super_block * rs; + int fs_blocksize; bh = sb_bread (s, offset / s->s_blocksize); @@ -961,8 +962,9 @@ // // ok, reiserfs signature (old or new) found in at the given offset // - sb_set_blocksize (s, sb_blocksize(rs)); + fs_blocksize = sb_blocksize(rs); brelse (bh); + sb_set_blocksize (s, fs_blocksize); bh = sb_bread (s, offset / s->s_blocksize); if (!bh) {