From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262221AbTKIISg (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Nov 2003 03:18:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262197AbTKIISg (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Nov 2003 03:18:36 -0500 Received: from 167.imtp.Ilyichevsk.Odessa.UA ([195.66.192.167]:27921 "HELO port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S262221AbTKIISf (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Nov 2003 03:18:35 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Denis Reply-To: vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: 2.6-test6: nanosleep+SIGCONT weirdness Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 10:18:25 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: Kernel Mailing List , George Anzinger References: <200311082232.59175.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> In-Reply-To: <200311082232.59175.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200311091018.25865.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 08 November 2003 22:32, Denis wrote: > > > That nanosleep restart seems to be broken, and quite frankly, > > > looking at the mess in kernel/posix-timers.c I'm not all that > > > surprised. The code is total and absolute crap. I have no idea > > > how it's even supposed to work. > > > > I'd suggest just removing the regular nanosleep() emulation from > > there. The clock_nanosleep() restart is likely still broken, but at > > least this way the _regular_ nanosleep() system call works > > correctly, and fixing clock_nanosleep() is likely easier since the > > restart stuff doesn't have to worry about _which_ system call it > > should restart. > > > > Denis, does this work for you? > > Does not seem to work, same symptoms 8( Ok I retested with pristine test9+patch and it works. -- vda