linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
To: Erik Jacobson <erikj@subway.americas.sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6 /proc/interrupts fails on systems with many CPUs
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 09:29:31 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031111092931.7b6d1d91.rddunlap@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SGI.4.53.0311111116440.360387@subway.americas.sgi.com>

On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:21:01 -0600 Erik Jacobson <erikj@subway.americas.sgi.com> wrote:

| Howdy.
| 
| On systems with lots of processors (512 for example), catting /proc/interrupts
| fails with a "not enough memory" error.
| 
| This was observed in 2.6.0-test8
| 
| I tracked this down to this in proc_misc.c:
| 
| static int interrupts_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
| {
|    unsigned size = 4096 * (1 + num_online_cpus() / 8);
|    char *buf = kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
| 
| The kmalloc fails here.
| 
| I'm looking for suggestions on how to fix this.  I came up with one fix
| that seems to work OK for ia64.  I have attached it to this message.
| I'm looking for advice on what should be proposed for the real fix.

An alternative is to limit 'size' to a maximum of 128 KB (or whatever
the max. kmalloc() on ia64 is) and continue to use kmalloc().
Does that work for you?

Another alternative is to convert show_interrupts to use a seq_file
iterator.

--
~Randy
MOTD:  Always include version info.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-11 17:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-11 17:21 2.6 /proc/interrupts fails on systems with many CPUs Erik Jacobson
2003-11-11 17:29 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2003-11-11 17:51 ` Robert Love
2003-11-11 18:02 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-11-11 18:24   ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-11 18:57     ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-11-11 18:36       ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-11 20:14     ` Anton Blanchard
2003-11-11 22:41       ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-11-11 22:32         ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-01-27  4:12     ` radeonfb problems with 2.6.2-rc2 Roland Dreier
2003-11-11 18:17 ` 2.6 /proc/interrupts fails on systems with many CPUs Linus Torvalds
2003-11-11 18:22   ` viro
2003-11-11 20:15     ` Jonathan Corbet
2003-11-11 18:32   ` Randy.Dunlap
2003-11-11 19:19 ` Anton Blanchard
2003-11-11 18:15 Manfred Spraul
     [not found] <BF1FE1855350A0479097B3A0D2A80EE0013B1188@hdsmsx402.hd.intel.com>
2003-11-11 19:55 ` Len Brown
2003-11-11 23:37   ` Erlend Aasland
2003-11-12  2:35     ` Martin J. Bligh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031111092931.7b6d1d91.rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --to=rddunlap@osdl.org \
    --cc=erikj@subway.americas.sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).