From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262086AbTKLO0X (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:26:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262101AbTKLO0X (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:26:23 -0500 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:10701 "EHLO outpost.ds9a.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262086AbTKLO0W (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2003 09:26:22 -0500 Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 15:26:19 +0100 From: bert hubert To: Marc Haber Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.21 sending out "need to fragment" on wrong interface Message-ID: <20031112142619.GA21966@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , Marc Haber , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20031103072917.GA18992@torres.ka0.zugschlus.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031103072917.GA18992@torres.ka0.zugschlus.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 08:29:17AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > Hi, > > I am using a Linux machine with freeS/WAN for my connectivity. The > default route points to the IPSEC link. It has recently begun to send > out "need to fragment" packets on the wrong interface. Linux-kernel is mostly about unpatched kernels, have you taken this up with the freeswan people? -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Open source, database driven DNS Software http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO