From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264420AbTKMU54 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:57:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264421AbTKMU54 (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:57:56 -0500 Received: from host213-160-108-25.dsl.vispa.com ([213.160.108.25]:7068 "HELO cenedra.office") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264420AbTKMU5z (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Nov 2003 15:57:55 -0500 From: Andrew Walrond To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: kernel.bkbits.net off the air Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:57:53 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 References: <200311131917.11773.andrew@walrond.org> <20031113192839.GA13330@work.bitmover.com> In-Reply-To: <20031113192839.GA13330@work.bitmover.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200311132057.53026.andrew@walrond.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 13 Nov 2003 7:28 pm, Larry McVoy wrote: You're getting to be a cynical old git ;) > What am I missing? The point. You got one major o/s project hosted on bk when you ought to have them all. Loads more developers using bk at home means loads more demanding it at work. And all it would take is a lobotomised, redistributable, license free client so anyone can pull o/s software from bk repos. And, for the record, you'd be a hungry fool if you GPLed bk.