From: "Job 317" <job317@mailvault.com>
To: Mark Hahn <hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.4.22 SMP kernel build for hyper threading P4
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 19:36:52 00100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031115183625.1BAA7840597@gateway.mailvault.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2138 bytes --]
On 15-Nov-2003 17:30:11 +0100, you wrote:
> > I have a new P4 Hyperthreading PC that I have installed RedHat9 on.
I am
>
> I presume you realize that anyone who understands HT has mostly scorn
for it.
I had no idea but it is still a huge improvement over my HP 755MHz
Celleron that I am replacing ;) Might I as why so and am I wasting my
time when a non-SMP kernel builds and works just fine?
>
> > api, etc.) but when I build my new 2.4.22 kernel with CONFIG_SMP=y
set
> > then reboot, I am seeing only one processor in /proc/cpuinfo. When
I
> > boot with my stock RH9 2.4.20-20.9smp kernel I see two virtual
> > processors show up in /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> I'm guessing you don't have acpi enabled.
Hmm... Let's have a look. I started by loading the
kernel-2.4.20-i686-smp.config file that came with the RH9 distro into
xconfig. I just turned on ntfs and a couple of other things and saved.
The comparision is strange. My new config file has:
# CONFIG_ACPI is not set
however the RH9 config file has:
# CONFIG_ACPI is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG is not set
# CONFIG_HOTPLUG_PCI_ACPI is not set
# CONFIG_ACPI_HT_ONLY is not s
CONFIG_ACPI_BUSMGR=m
CONFIG_ACPI_SYS=m
CONFIG_ACPI_CPU=m
CONFIG_ACPI_BUTTON=m
CONFIG_ACPI_AC=m
CONFIG_ACPI_EC=m
CONFIG_ACPI_CMBATT=m
CONFIG_ACPI_THERMAL=m
CONFIG_ACPI_RELAXED_AML=y
So should I have all this or no?
>
> > I've even build a 2.4.22 kernel with the config-2.4.20-20.9smp
> > configuration that came with RH9.
>
> RH doesn't ship kernel.org sources, of course. hence the -20.
Rgr. I got this.
>
> > I build with the straightforward 'make dep clean bzImage modules
> > modules_install' command. Is this correct?
>
> sure. obviously, you need to verify that you're booting the kernel
> that you just made, etc.
It does boot and everything else "seems" fine. Just that I still only
get one virtual CPU showing up in /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> > Am I missing a step to build a smp kernel for hyper threading?
>
> HT is a non-feature; it requires nothing from the kernel. I'm
> guessing your problem is bios or acpi.
>
I still don't understand. So am I wasting my time with HT?
Thanks,
Job
next reply other threads:[~2003-11-15 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-15 18:36 Job 317 [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-11-23 20:06 2.4.22 SMP kernel build for hyper threading P4 Brown, Len
2003-11-15 15:40 Job 317
2003-11-15 16:40 ` Eduard Bloch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20031115183625.1BAA7840597@gateway.mailvault.com \
--to=job317@mailvault.com \
--cc=hahn@physics.mcmaster.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).