From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264327AbTKZVDb (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:03:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264328AbTKZVDb (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:03:31 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:7319 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264327AbTKZVDa (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Nov 2003 16:03:30 -0500 Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 13:02:54 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: "Theodore Ts'o" Cc: ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Fire Engine?? Message-Id: <20031126130254.010440e5.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20031126202216.GA13116@thunk.org> References: <20031125183035.1c17185a.davem@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <20031126113040.3b774360.davem@redhat.com> <20031126202216.GA13116@thunk.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.6; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 15:22:16 -0500 "Theodore Ts'o" wrote: > I believe what Andi was suggesting was if there was **no** processes > that are currently requesting timestamps, then we can dispense with > taking the timestamp. You can predict what the arguments will be for the user's recvmsg() system call at the time of packet reception? Wow, show me how :)