From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264476AbTK0LA3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 06:00:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264477AbTK0LA3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 06:00:29 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:45467 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264476AbTK0LA2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 06:00:28 -0500 Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 02:59:21 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: "YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@" Cc: felipe_alfaro@linuxmail.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6]: IPv6: strcpy -> strlcpy Message-Id: <20031127025921.3fed8dd4.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20031127.173320.19253188.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> References: <1069920883.2476.1.camel@teapot.felipe-alfaro.com> <20031127.173320.19253188.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.6; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 17:33:20 +0900 (JST) YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / _$B5HF#1QL@ wrote: > - strcpy(t->parms.name, dev->name); > + strlcpy(t->parms.name, dev->name, IFNAMSIZ); > sizeof(t->parms.name) > > or something like that. I agree, using sizeof() is the less error prone way of doing things like this. Felipe could you please rewrite your patch like this? Thank you.