linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, arjanv@redhat.com
Cc: davem@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fire Engine??
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:16:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200311271316.05147.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031126235809.131fde15.ak@suse.de>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 26 November 2003 23:58, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 22:34:10 +0100
> Arjan van de Ven <arjanv@redhat.com> wrote:
> > question: do we need a timestamp for every packet or can we do one
> > timestamp per irq-context entry ? (eg one timestamp at irq entry time we
> > do anyway and keep that for all packets processed in the softirq)
>
> If people want the timestamp they usually want it to be accurate
> (e.g. for tcpdump etc.). of course there is already a lot of jitter
> in this information because it is done relatively late in the device
> driver (long after the NIC has received the packet)
>
> Just most people never care about this at all....

Yes, these people not caring just open a SOCK_STREAM or SOCK_DGRAM. I
don't see any field in msghdr, which contains the time.

Other people have packet sockets (or other special stuff) opened, which
is usally bound to a device or to a special RX/TX path. So we know,
which device does need it and which not.

If in doubt, there could be an sysctl option for exact time per device
or for all.

But I'm not really that familiar with the networking code, so please
ignore my ignorance on any issues here.


Regards

Ingo Oeser

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/xesDU56oYWuOrkARAr1sAJ9h/EywUCb9wGVCZiW9GbivMiEVsACghj74
dE4EdzeW84U7QcMi/o+Q9qE=
=70Cm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


  reply	other threads:[~2003-11-27 12:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <BAY1-DAV15JU71pROHD000040e2@hotmail.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <20031125183035.1c17185a.davem@redhat.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2003-11-26  9:53   ` Fire Engine?? Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 11:35     ` John Bradford
2003-11-26 18:50       ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-26 19:19         ` Diego Calleja García
2003-11-26 19:59           ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-27  3:54           ` Bill Huey
2003-11-26 15:00     ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-26 23:01       ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 23:23         ` Trond Myklebust
2003-11-26 23:38           ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 19:30     ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 19:58       ` Paul Menage
2003-11-26 20:03         ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 22:29           ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 22:36             ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 22:56               ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 23:13                 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 23:29                   ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 23:41                   ` Ben Greear
2003-11-27  0:01                     ` Fast timestamps David S. Miller
2003-11-27  0:30                       ` Mitchell Blank Jr
2003-11-27  1:57                       ` Ben Greear
2003-11-26 20:01       ` Fire Engine?? Jamie Lokier
2003-11-26 20:04         ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 21:54         ` Pekka Pietikainen
2003-11-26 20:22       ` Theodore Ts'o
2003-11-26 21:02         ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 21:24           ` Jamie Lokier
2003-11-26 21:38             ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26 23:43               ` Jamie Lokier
2003-11-26 21:34       ` Arjan van de Ven
2003-11-26 22:58         ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-27 12:16           ` Ingo Oeser [this message]
2003-11-26 22:39       ` Andi Kleen
2003-11-26 22:46         ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26  0:15 Mr. BOFH
2003-11-26  2:30 ` David S. Miller
2003-11-26  5:41 ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200311271316.05147.ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
    --to=ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).