From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264533AbTK0O57 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:57:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264534AbTK0O57 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:57:59 -0500 Received: from ftp.symdata.com ([207.44.192.51]:31456 "HELO dev.symdata.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264533AbTK0O56 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:57:58 -0500 From: Simon Organization: highlyillogical.org To: Marco Roeland Subject: Re: [2.6.0-test10] cpufreq: 2G P4M won't go above 1.2G - cpuinfo_max_freq too low Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 14:57:48 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 Cc: Linux Kernel Development References: <200311271139.07260.simon@highlyillogical.org> <200311271323.37123.simon@highlyillogical.org> <20031127134245.GA9404@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20031127134245.GA9404@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200311271457.48812.simon@highlyillogical.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 27 November 2003 1:42 pm, Marco Roeland wrote: > > Seems that this is a fault of a better implementation of something... But > > "better" to me shouldn't take away choice of cpu speed from the user? ;) > > One last straw you might try, is building all the different cpufreq > drivers as modules, and trying if modprobeing one of them might work. > They seem to all behave slightly differently with respect to what they > assume to be true from the ACPI reported values, and what they try on > their own. You're a star, thankyou. It was loading p4-clockmod by default. I had all the pentium-related modules compiled in, and it was behaving like that... dmesg said it was loading p4-clockmod. I modprobe'd speedstep-ich instead, and foom! Straight up to 2ghz. Thanks, Simon