linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: James Bourne <jbourne@hardrock.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org
Subject: Re: [netfilter-core] 2.4.23/others and ip_conntrack causing hangs
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:22:59 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20031201015604.816D52C06F@lists.samba.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 30 Nov 2003 12:21:33 PDT." <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311301204520.2148-100000@cafe.hardrock.org>

In message <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311301204520.2148-100000@cafe.hardrock.org> you writ
e:
> Hi all,
> I wanted to bring up an issue with ip_conntrack in 2.4.23, 2.4.22, and at
> least 2.4.21 (sorry, didn't try 2.4.20).
> 
> The issue is that as long as there are connections being tracked, the
> ip_conntrack module will not unload.  I can understand why this might be,
> but the problem is that ip_conntrack will hang rmmod and modprobe -r until
> such time as all the connections have been closed.
> 
> I think we need something like an ip_conntrack_flush or else completely drop
> the connections when the module is unloaded (as previously done) as this
> becomes an issue for people who need to drop their ip_tables and reload the
> modules (perhaps to correct other issues) especially ip_conntrack...  

Um, this is exactly what the code does on unload: an explicit flush.

Unfortunately, some packets are still referencing connections, so the
module *cannot* go away.  Figuring out exactly where the packets are
referenced from is the fun part.  We explicitly drop the reference in
ip_local_deliver_finish() for exactly this reason.  Perhaps there is
somewhere else we should be doing the same thing.

Hope that clarifies,
Rusty.
--
  Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell.

  reply	other threads:[~2003-12-01  1:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-11-30 19:21 2.4.23/others and ip_conntrack causing hangs James Bourne
2003-12-01  0:22 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2003-12-02  0:20   ` [netfilter-core] " Patrick McHardy
2003-12-02  6:33     ` Rusty Russell
2003-12-02 23:18       ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20031201015604.816D52C06F@lists.samba.org \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=coreteam@netfilter.org \
    --cc=jbourne@hardrock.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).