From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262355AbTLAJZO (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 04:25:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262395AbTLAJZN (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 04:25:13 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:50655 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262355AbTLAJZJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 04:25:09 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:24:46 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Nathan Scott Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: XFS for 2.4 Message-ID: <20031201092446.GK6454@suse.de> References: <20031201062052.GA2022@frodo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031201062052.GA2022@frodo> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 01 2003, Nathan Scott wrote: > Hi Marcelo, > > Please do a > > bk pull http://xfs.org:8090/linux-2.4+coreXFS > > This will merge the core 2.4 kernel changes required for supporting > the XFS filesystem, as listed below. If this all looks acceptable, > then please also pull the filesystem-specific code (fs/xfs/*) > > bk pull http://xfs.org:8090/linux-2.4+justXFS Where can these be found as a unified diff? It's quite bothersome to have to pull a changeset just to review it (cloning a kernel tree first), not to mention space intensive. -- Jens Axboe