From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264353AbTLBUWf (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:22:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264358AbTLBUWd (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:22:33 -0500 Received: from twilight.cs.hut.fi ([130.233.40.5]:30961 "EHLO twilight.cs.hut.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264353AbTLBUTy (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:19:54 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:19:34 +0200 From: Ville Herva To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 future Message-ID: <20031202201933.GE1524@niksula.cs.hut.fi> Mail-Followup-To: Ville Herva , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200312011226.04750.nbensa@gmx.net> <20031202115436.GA10288@physik.tu-cottbus.de> <20031202120315.GK13388@conectiva.com.br> <20031202131311.GA10915@physik.tu-cottbus.de> <3FCC95BB.60205@wmich.edu> <20031202160136.GB10915@physik.tu-cottbus.de> <20031202160853.GB22608@gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031202160853.GB22608@gtf.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 11:08:53AM -0500, you [Jeff Garzik] wrote: > Bug fixes, security errata, and the like will always be OK for 2.4. Just > like Alan continues to release new 2.2.x releases, when major bugs are > found. Which btw invites the question: the recent brk() security fix was ported from 2.5 to 2.4, right? Any idea whether it applies to 2.2 (and 2.0), too? -- v -- v@iki.fi