From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264333AbTLBUA3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:00:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264341AbTLBUA3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:00:29 -0500 Received: from mout2.freenet.de ([194.97.50.155]:8911 "EHLO mout2.freenet.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264333AbTLBUAW convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:00:22 -0500 From: Michael Buesch To: "Stefan J. Betz" Subject: Re: include/linux/version.h Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 21:00:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.93 References: In-Reply-To: Cc: linux kernel mailing list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: <200312022100.14880.mbuesch@freenet.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 02 December 2003 19:35, Stefan J. Betz wrote: > Hello People, Hi Stefan, > i have found some wrong thing in include/linux/version.h > On my System i have Kernel 2.6.0-test10 & 2.6.0-test11, but in > include/linux/version.h i see: > #define UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test9" > > correct where: > #definde UTS_RELEASE "2.6.0-test11" (for Linux Kernel 2.6.0-test11)... Hm, I think that file is automatically generated at compile-time, isn't it? Are you sure, you grepped through the correct tree? Or is this an old one, that was sitting in some dusty corner on your disk? > Greeting Betz Stefan > > I know that my english is not realy good, but any tipp how i can learn > better english is welcome... Don't read my mails, because they are ugly english, too. 8-) - -- Regards Michael Buesch [ http://www.tuxsoft.de.vu ] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/zO9NoxoigfggmSgRAhLMAJ43jo4/Pw7em+LbHRMUB4rgn/79EACfb8xa fAFiprdxGFZE+aBLRePHS5s= =6MLE -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----