From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264416AbTLBXCU (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 18:02:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264422AbTLBXCU (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 18:02:20 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:8201 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264416AbTLBXCT (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 18:02:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:02:16 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: bill davidsen Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: libata in 2.4.24? Message-ID: <20031202230216.GB4154@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: bill davidsen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3FCB8312.3050703@rackable.com> <87iskz9hp6.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv> <20031202190646.GA9043@gtf.org> <877k1f9e1g.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:34:20PM +0000, Bill Davidsen wrote: > after each O_SYNC write, so that's probably not practical. Clearly the > best solution is a full SCSI implementation over PATA/SATA, but that > would eliminate some of the justification for SCSI devices at premium > prices. In many ways, that is exactly what SATA is. :)