From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264356AbTLBUKq (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:10:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264353AbTLBUKq (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:10:46 -0500 Received: from mtvcafw.SGI.COM ([192.48.171.6]:58726 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264352AbTLBUKi (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Dec 2003 15:10:38 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 07:10:06 +1100 From: Nathan Scott To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: XFS for 2.4 Message-ID: <20031203071006.B2022202@wobbly.melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20031202182746.A27964@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com on Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:12:53PM -0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:12:53PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > Ok, Christoph agreed to review the changes. He has a clue about VFS. > > If he is OK with them, I'll merge the generic XFS changes. > Thanks Marcelo. If anything needs clarifying just let me know, or if you have specific requests for XFS changes (provided they don't compromise "super-maintenance mode" of course). Christoph is also very familiar with XFS now, he might be willing to help out reviewing that too. cheers. ps: thanks to everyone who chimed in with a kind word for XFS! (group hug?) -- Nathan