From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S261270AbTLCUvv (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:51:51 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261492AbTLCUvv
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:51:51 -0500
Received: from havoc.gtf.org ([63.247.75.124]:44464 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261270AbTLCUvs (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:51:48 -0500
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 15:51:47 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Jan Rychter <jan@rychter.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4 future
Message-ID: <20031203205147.GB27369@gtf.org>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0312011212090.13692-100000@logos.cnet> <m2k75dzj6n.fsf@tnuctip.rychter.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m2k75dzj6n.fsf@tnuctip.rychter.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 01:26:56PM -0800, Jan Rychter wrote:
> I find your statements on 2.6.0 being stable enough for users rather
> alarming. I'll use this occasion to write about my gripes with Linux
> development, with hopes that perhaps this will help some developers
> understand people's needs better.

The point is that 2.6.0 has reached the point where major new
development and merging should be occurring there, not in 2.4.

	Jeff