From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262745AbTLFEA5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 23:00:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264887AbTLFEA5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 23:00:57 -0500 Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net ([64.164.98.52]:56283 "EHLO mtaw4.prodigy.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262745AbTLFEA4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Dec 2003 23:00:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 20:00:41 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: Craig Bradney Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Catching NForce2 lockup with NMI watchdog - found? Message-ID: <20031206040041.GU29119@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: Craig Bradney , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <1070672114.2759.8.camel@big.pomac.com> <1070675560.4117.9.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1070675560.4117.9.camel@athlonxp.bradney.info> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 02:52:40AM +0100, Craig Bradney wrote: > Im not getting any NMI counts.. should I use nmi-watchdog=1? Yes, try with nmi-watchdog=1 it should work with apic, or io-apic (or both) enabled.