From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265155AbTLFNH3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:07:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265158AbTLFNH3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:07:29 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([199.26.172.102]:33238 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265155AbTLFNH2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Dec 2003 08:07:28 -0500 Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 05:07:24 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Mika Penttil? Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Numaq in 2.4 and 2.6 Message-ID: <20031206130724.GR8039@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Mika Penttil? , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3FD1A54F.101@kolumbus.fi> <20031206112348.GP8039@holomorphy.com> <3FD1C94C.1020104@kolumbus.fi> <20031206123622.GQ8039@holomorphy.com> <3FD1D4F6.7000106@kolumbus.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3FD1D4F6.7000106@kolumbus.fi> Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 03:09:10PM +0200, Mika Penttil? wrote: > and later in same function : > phys_cpu_present_map |= apicid_to_phys_cpu_present(m->mpc_apicid); > but _not_ > phys_cpu_present_map |= apicid_to_phys_cpu_present(logical_apicid); > as one would expect (and would make it identical to 2.6 behaviour).... A > bug? You may very well have just debugged an issue I've had with 2.4 on the things. =) -- wli