From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265408AbTLHOMv (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:12:51 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265410AbTLHOMo (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:12:44 -0500 Received: from mail.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.232.194]:37867 "EHLO mail.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265424AbTLHOLz (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 09:11:55 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:08:16 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: Maciej Zenczykowski Cc: Pat LaVarre , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox , Erez Zadok , Phillip Lougher , Kallol Biswas Subject: Re: partially encrypted filesystem Message-ID: <20031208140816.GA10448@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <1070674555.2939.35.camel@patibmrh9> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 6 December 2003 12:43:28 +0100, Maciej Zenczykowski wrote: > > In other words you are likely to hit fs bugs and slowdowns. If you hit bugs, great! File a bug report, the developers should be glad you found it. And before ranting about the possible massive slowdown, make a quick benchmark. If there really is, *then* you can rant on. :) Jörn -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, but not tried it. -- Donald Knuth