From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262652AbTLIDNG (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 22:13:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262655AbTLIDNG (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 22:13:06 -0500 Received: from fw.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:34454 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262652AbTLIDNB (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 22:13:01 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:12:58 -0800 From: Mark Wong To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, osdldbt-general@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: hyperthreading performance with dbt-2 on 2.6.0-test11 Message-ID: <20031208191258.A6933@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net> Mail-Followup-To: Nick Piggin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, osdldbt-general@lists.sourceforge.net References: <200312082354.hB8NsqZ17359@mail.osdl.org> <3FD51496.5000500@cyberone.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3FD51496.5000500@cyberone.com.au>; from piggin@cyberone.com.au on Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:17:26AM +1100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 11:17:26AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > markw@osdl.org wrote: > > >Hello, I have some data with hyperthreading I wanted to share. > > > >I've seen about a 15% performance decrease in performance on a 4-way > >Xeon system when I enable hyperthreading for my DBT-2 workload. I also > >gave Ingo's test11-C1 patch that someone pointed me to a try and only > >saw a 12% decrease. Has anyone found this to be common with any specific > >workloads? > > > >I'm not really sure what to look for, but I do see some changes in the > >readprofile data, which I've copied in part below. It appears that the > >count of schedule, __make_request, and try_to_wake_up are the only > >functions at the top of the profile that are significantly different. > >The links I have posted also have pointers to oprofile data as well as > >annotated assembly source output, if that interests anyone. If I can > >provide any other details, let me know. > > > > Hi Mark, > It could be cache contention which I think is typically the reason > hyperthreading can hurt performance. Its basically impossible for > the scheduler to correct this automatically (access to performance > counters might make it slightly less impossible). > > Probably the CPU hotplug interface would enable a tool to effectively > turn HT on or off and it would be up to an administrator to tune > performance. > > You could try my scheduler patchset if you like. I have recently got > HT support working (its against test11, you need to turn CONFIG_SMT > on), although if Ingo's patch doesn't help much, mine probably won't > either. Hi Nick, Went ahead and tried your patch, but it looks like something's wrong. If this helps any: Process postmaster (pid: 1086, threadinfo=f5c40000 task=f5c586b0) Stack: f5c5007b 0000007b ffffffff c011f488 00000060 00010046 00000005 c322ccc0 c322c060 00000002 f5c5bdbc f686cb90 f686cb90 f5c41d4c f7f93940 f5ca6080 00000007 00000000 c322ccc0 00006f12 03d99f34 0000033d f5c586b0 f5c41dbc Call Trace: [] schedule+0x380/0x705 [] sys_semtimedop+0x460/0x530 [] find_busiest_group+0x2bc/0x2e3 [] p4_check_ctrs+0xab/0x11b [] find_busiest_group+0x2bc/0x2e3 [] nmi_callback+0x25/0x29 [] buffered_rmqueue+0xea/0x199 [] nmi_stack_correct+0x1e/0x2e [] __alloc_pages+0xaf/0x334 [] generic_file_aio_write_nolock+0x298/0xa9e [] do_anonymous_page+0x16a/0x28b [] handle_mm_fault+0x101/0x1ad [] do_page_fault+0x2fa/0x4fc [] rebalance_tick+0x8a/0x91 [] oprofile_add_sample+0x9b/0x117 [] p4_check_ctrs+0xab/0x11b [] sys_ipc+0x61/0x2ae [] nmi_callback+0x25/0x29 [] do_nmi+0x39/0x5a [] sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x71 Code: Bad EIP value.