From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261332AbTLHTXf (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:23:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261344AbTLHTXf (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:23:35 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([199.26.172.102]:52700 "EHLO holomorphy.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261332AbTLHTXd (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:23:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 11:23:28 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andrew Volkov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PROBLEM: possible proceses leak Message-ID: <20031208192328.GN8039@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Volkov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <2E74F312D6980D459F3A05492BA40F8D0391B0EE@clue.transas.com> <20031208185121.GM8039@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Heh, no wonder everyone wants to get rid of the things. On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 11:09:41AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > No, they are all correct. No bug here, move along folks, nothing to see.. > Linus Looks like I missed that bit of preempt magic the first time around the need_resched: path in entry.S. Easy enough to drop this one. -- wli