From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262074AbTLHXmA (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:42:00 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261950AbTLHXkc (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:40:32 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([65.200.24.183]:12702 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261974AbTLHXkF (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Dec 2003 18:40:05 -0500 Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 15:38:40 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Andrew Walrond Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: State of devfs in 2.6? Message-ID: <20031208233840.GD31370@kroah.com> References: <200312081536.26022.andrew@walrond.org> <20031208154256.GV19856@holomorphy.com> <200312081559.04771.andrew@walrond.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200312081559.04771.andrew@walrond.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 03:59:04PM +0000, Andrew Walrond wrote: > > So how good is the device coverage offered by sysfs/udev ? Do they provide a > viable/complete MAKEDEV replacement yet? It works for me on my laptop :) You might have different devices and need other things. If so, please let me know after trying it out. greg k-h