From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265830AbTLIOOb (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:14:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265843AbTLIOOa (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:14:30 -0500 Received: from smithers.nildram.co.uk ([195.112.4.54]:45063 "EHLO smithers.nildram.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265830AbTLIOO0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:14:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 14:16:27 +0000 From: Joe Thornber To: M?ns Rullg?rd Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Device-mapper submission for 2.4 Message-ID: <20031209141627.GH472@reti> References: <20031209115806.GA472@reti> <20031209134551.GG472@reti> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 03:00:15PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote: > None. Neither will go into 2.4, if I've understood things correctly. http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/1751