From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263595AbTLJPZy (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:25:54 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263596AbTLJPZy (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:25:54 -0500 Received: from ipcop.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.15]:50609 "EHLO work.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263595AbTLJPZx (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Dec 2003 10:25:53 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 07:25:50 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andre Hedrick , Paul Adams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux GPL and binary module exception clause? Message-ID: <20031210152550.GB6896@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Linus Torvalds , Andre Hedrick , Paul Adams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 07:14:31AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Go back and read what I said. I said _nothing_ like the above. Quite the > reverse. Err, you might reread some of what you have said and what people are saying about it. Here are a few references as well as some other interesting links. http://www.mail-archive.com/license-discuss@opensource.org/msg05842.html http://www.mail-archive.com/license-discuss@opensource.org/msg05865.html http://www.mail-archive.com/license-discuss@opensource.org/msg05867.html http://www.mail-archive.com/license-discuss@opensource.org/msg05882.html http://www.mail-archive.com/license-discuss@opensource.org/msg05888.html http://www.rosenlaw.com/html/GL18.pdf http://www.charvolant.org/~doug/gpl/gpl.pdf That's a start, there are a pile more, I'll put them up on a web page when I have some time. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm